Architecture | |||||
Bachelor | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 6 |
Course Code: | MİMBS106 | ||||||||
Course Name: | Mekan, Katılım Ve Tasarım | ||||||||
Course Semester: |
Fall |
||||||||
Course Credits: |
|
||||||||
Language of instruction: | TR-EN | ||||||||
Course Requisites: | |||||||||
Does the Course Require Work Experience?: | No | ||||||||
Type of course: | Department Elective | ||||||||
Course Level: |
|
||||||||
Mode of Delivery: | Face to face | ||||||||
Course Coordinator : | Dr.Öğr.Üyesi MELODY SAFARKHANI | ||||||||
Course Lecturer(s): |
Öğr.Gör. B.Öğretim Elemanı Dr.Öğr.Üyesi MELODY SAFARKHANI |
||||||||
Course Assistants: |
Course Objectives: | To reveal the general concepts on production of space, to run discussions on alternative ways of design and the milieu of contemporary architecture |
Course Content: | Architecture, as a design field is grounded on production of space. This spatial practice is unavoidably bounded with production relations/networks. This natural relation, describing the dependent character of architecture, defines a main research and discussion topic within architectural history and theory. Within these multi-component relations of production such as actors, natural resources, users, legislations, economy, and politics; what different manifestations of architecture can appear? Can different models be created in contemporary architecture when taken in more interaction with other design practices? Within the scope of this course, mainstream and alternative practices and discourses of the contemporary architecture will be opened to discussion. |
The students who have succeeded in this course;
|
Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
1) | Introduction | |
2) | General Concepts: Space and Design | Lefebvre, H. (2015). Production of Space |
3) | Production of Space and Relations | Harvey,D. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism |
4) | Production of Space and Relations | Harvey,D. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism |
5) | The Role of the Architect as an Actor | Harvey,D. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism |
6) | The Role of the Architect as an Actor | Jones, Petrescu, Till. (2005). Architecture and Participation |
7) | Contemporary Design Issues in the Discourse and Practice of Architecture | |
8) | Mid-Term Exam / Presentations | |
9) | Contemporary Design Issues in the Discourse and Practice of Architecture | Jones, Petrescu, Till. (2005). Architecture and Participation |
10) | Mainstream Architecture and Alternatives / Examples | Hossein Sadri “Profession vs Ethics” |
11) | Mainstream Architecture and Alternatives / Examples | Giovanna Borasi “Another Way of Building Architecture” |
12) | Mainstream Architecture and Alternatives / Examples | Priscila Pacheco “Public Spaces: Participation as a Tool to Build More Democratic Cities” |
13) | Mainstream Architecture and Alternatives / Examples | Harvey,D. “Social Justice and City” |
14) | Mainstream Architecture and Alternatives / Examples | Harvey,D. “The Right to the City” |
Course Notes / Textbooks: | Evet |
References: | Torlak, S., Kulak, Ö. (ed.) (2014). Mekân Meselesi. Tekin Yayınevi, İstanbul Harvey, D. (2003). Sosyal Adalet ve Şehir. Metis Yayınları, İstanbul Harvey, D. (2008). “Kent Hakkı”, New Left Review 53, Eylül-Ekim 2008: s.23-40. Lefebvre, H. (2015). Mekânın Üretimi. Sel Yayıncılık, İstanbul. Busch, O.V. (2015) Tasarlanacak Ne Kaldı?, Puna Yayın, İstanbul. Hacıalibeyoğlu, F. (2014). Katılımcı Planlama: Mimari Tasarım Sürecinde Katılım Sorunu ve Yaklaşımlar. Mimarlık Dergisi, Sayı:379 Mishchenko, E.D. (2018). Kapsayıcı Bir Kent Mümkün mü, Mekanda Adalet Derneği, https://beyond.istanbul/kapsayıcı-bir-kent-mümkün-mü-803a70a80df0 Canta, D. (2018). Yeni Trend: Katılımcı Tasarım, XXI Dergisi, Sayı: 170, s.24-27 Uzer, E. (2017). Katılımcı Tasarım: Nasıl ve Kim İçin?, XXI Dergisi, Mart 2017 Yırtıcı, H. (2005). Çağdaş Kapitalizmin Mekânsal Örgütlenmesi. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul Tanyeli, U. (2017). Yıkarak Yapmak. Metis Yayınları, İstanbul. Yeğin,M., Tanok, T.M. (2014) Kent Reformu ve Yeni Gecekondu Hareketi. NotaBene Yay., İstanbul |
Learning Outcomes | 1 |
2 |
3 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Outcomes | |||||||||
1) - Gaining discursive, theoretical and factual information from various environments, in local, national and global context for related field, architectural design/ planning/ design activities and researches, she has required ability and comprehension to reflect the information on academic environment. | |||||||||
2) - Has intellectual, discursive, scientific, technologic, esthetic, artistic, historic and cultural information and comprehension about related field. | |||||||||
3) - Has knowledge and understanding on human and community oriented and sensitive to environment (natural and built) architectural design/ planning/ design/ research methods on the related field. | |||||||||
4) - Has multidimensional knowledge and understanding on economics, topics related to disasters and environmental and societal sustainability principles and standards. | |||||||||
5) - They have knowledge about the principles, laws, regulations and standards related to their field. | |||||||||
6) - Has knowledge and understanding about institutional and ethical values related to the concerned field. | |||||||||
7) - Has knowledge and understanding about the place / importance of the related field in its historical, geographical, social and cultural context. | |||||||||
8) - Has ability to develop concepts in architectural design/ planning/ design fields. | |||||||||
9) - Has ability to provide integrity between discourse, theory and practise for architectural design / planning / design activities and researches. | |||||||||
10) - Has ability to identify facts, potential, problems and required researches for these in architectural design/ planning/ design issues. |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
1) | - Gaining discursive, theoretical and factual information from various environments, in local, national and global context for related field, architectural design/ planning/ design activities and researches, she has required ability and comprehension to reflect the information on academic environment. | 3 |
2) | - Has intellectual, discursive, scientific, technologic, esthetic, artistic, historic and cultural information and comprehension about related field. | 3 |
3) | - Has knowledge and understanding on human and community oriented and sensitive to environment (natural and built) architectural design/ planning/ design/ research methods on the related field. | 3 |
4) | - Has multidimensional knowledge and understanding on economics, topics related to disasters and environmental and societal sustainability principles and standards. | 3 |
5) | - They have knowledge about the principles, laws, regulations and standards related to their field. | 3 |
6) | - Has knowledge and understanding about institutional and ethical values related to the concerned field. | 3 |
7) | - Has knowledge and understanding about the place / importance of the related field in its historical, geographical, social and cultural context. | 3 |
8) | - Has ability to develop concepts in architectural design/ planning/ design fields. | 3 |
9) | - Has ability to provide integrity between discourse, theory and practise for architectural design / planning / design activities and researches. | 3 |
10) | - Has ability to identify facts, potential, problems and required researches for these in architectural design/ planning/ design issues. | 3 |
Individual study and homework | |
Lesson | |
Homework | |
Project preparation |
Written Exam (Open-ended questions, multiple choice, true-false, matching, fill in the blanks, sequencing) | |
Homework | |
Application | |
Individual Project | |
Group project | |
Presentation |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Attendance | 14 | % 15 |
Quizzes | 1 | % 10 |
Presentation | 1 | % 15 |
Project | 1 | % 30 |
Midterms | 1 | % 29 |
Final | 1 | % 1 |
total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 99 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 1 | |
total | % 100 |
Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
Course Hours | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Presentations / Seminar | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Homework Assignments | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Final | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Total Workload | 60 |