Architecture | |||||
Bachelor | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 6 |
Course Code: | MİMBS107 | ||||||||
Course Name: | Mekanda Eleştirel Pratikler | ||||||||
Course Semester: |
Spring |
||||||||
Course Credits: |
|
||||||||
Language of instruction: | TR-EN | ||||||||
Course Requisites: | |||||||||
Does the Course Require Work Experience?: | No | ||||||||
Type of course: | Department Elective | ||||||||
Course Level: |
|
||||||||
Mode of Delivery: | Face to face | ||||||||
Course Coordinator : | Öğr.Gör. B.Öğretim Elemanı | ||||||||
Course Lecturer(s): | |||||||||
Course Assistants: |
Course Objectives: | To give the knowledge and awareness on general principals of accessibility, sustainability and design for everyone at all scales of open and built environment design |
Course Content: | Students are expected to make qualitative analyses in relation to experience and behavior in a specific space. Site-visits and analyses are required. In connection to the analyses, students are asked to suggest design ideas that will transform spatial experience and add meaning to the space by simple interferences. Evaluation of the term will be done through in-class performance and submissions. |
The students who have succeeded in this course;
|
Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
1) | Introduction | yok |
1) | General Concepts | - |
2) | General Concepts | - |
4) | Site Visit and Discussions on-Site | - |
5) | Analysis after Site-Visit | - |
6) | Analysis after Site-Visit | - |
7) | Analysis and Definition of the Design Problem | - |
8) | Analysis and Definition of the Design Problem | - |
9) | Mid-Term Jury | - |
10) | Design-Intervention Tactic Proposals | - |
11) | Design-Intervention Tactic Proposals | - |
12) | Tasarım-Müdahale-Taktik Önerileri | - |
13) | Design-Intervention Tactic Proposals | - |
14) | Design-Intervention Tactic Proposals | - |
Course Notes / Textbooks: | EVET |
References: | Lynch, K., 1960, The Image of the City, MIT Press, Cambridge. Meiss, P., 1991, Elements of Architecture, Van Nostrand Reinhold, London. Pallasmaa, J., 2014, Tenin Gözleri: Mimarlık ve Duygular, YEM Yayın, İstanbul. Merleau-Ponty, M., 2010, Algılanan Dünya, Ö. Aygün (Çev.). İstanbul: Metis. (İlk Baskı 1948). Merleau-Ponty, M., 1996, Göz ve Tin, Çev: A. Soysal, Metis Yayınları, İstanbul. Rapoport, A., 2004, Kültür, Mimarlık, Tasarım, YEM Yayınevi, İstanbul. Rasmussen, S. E., 1994, Yaşanan Mimari, Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul. Schulz, C.N., 1971, Existance, Space and Architecture, Studio Vista, London. Mimarlık ve Mekân Algısı, TMMOB Mimarlar Odası Ankara Şubesi, Dosya 17, Aralık 2009. Lefebvre, H., Ergüden Işık. (çev.) (2014). Mekânın Üretimi. İstanbul: Sel. |
Learning Outcomes | 1 |
2 |
3 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Outcomes | |||||||||
1) - Gaining discursive, theoretical and factual information from various environments, in local, national and global context for related field, architectural design/ planning/ design activities and researches, she has required ability and comprehension to reflect the information on academic environment. | |||||||||
2) - Has intellectual, discursive, scientific, technologic, esthetic, artistic, historic and cultural information and comprehension about related field. | |||||||||
3) - Has knowledge and understanding on human and community oriented and sensitive to environment (natural and built) architectural design/ planning/ design/ research methods on the related field. | |||||||||
4) - Has multidimensional knowledge and understanding on economics, topics related to disasters and environmental and societal sustainability principles and standards. | |||||||||
5) - They have knowledge about the principles, laws, regulations and standards related to their field. | |||||||||
6) - Has knowledge and understanding about institutional and ethical values related to the concerned field. | |||||||||
7) - Has knowledge and understanding about the place / importance of the related field in its historical, geographical, social and cultural context. | |||||||||
8) - Has ability to develop concepts in architectural design/ planning/ design fields. | |||||||||
9) - Has ability to provide integrity between discourse, theory and practise for architectural design / planning / design activities and researches. | |||||||||
10) - Has ability to identify facts, potential, problems and required researches for these in architectural design/ planning/ design issues. |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
1) | - Gaining discursive, theoretical and factual information from various environments, in local, national and global context for related field, architectural design/ planning/ design activities and researches, she has required ability and comprehension to reflect the information on academic environment. | 3 |
2) | - Has intellectual, discursive, scientific, technologic, esthetic, artistic, historic and cultural information and comprehension about related field. | 3 |
3) | - Has knowledge and understanding on human and community oriented and sensitive to environment (natural and built) architectural design/ planning/ design/ research methods on the related field. | 2 |
4) | - Has multidimensional knowledge and understanding on economics, topics related to disasters and environmental and societal sustainability principles and standards. | 4 |
5) | - They have knowledge about the principles, laws, regulations and standards related to their field. | 3 |
6) | - Has knowledge and understanding about institutional and ethical values related to the concerned field. | 3 |
7) | - Has knowledge and understanding about the place / importance of the related field in its historical, geographical, social and cultural context. | 3 |
8) | - Has ability to develop concepts in architectural design/ planning/ design fields. | 4 |
9) | - Has ability to provide integrity between discourse, theory and practise for architectural design / planning / design activities and researches. | 4 |
10) | - Has ability to identify facts, potential, problems and required researches for these in architectural design/ planning/ design issues. | 5 |
Field Study | |
Individual study and homework | |
Lesson | |
Homework |
Written Exam (Open-ended questions, multiple choice, true-false, matching, fill in the blanks, sequencing) | |
Homework | |
Individual Project | |
Presentation |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Attendance | 1 | % 10 |
Homework Assignments | 1 | % 15 |
Project | 1 | % 30 |
Jury | 1 | % 15 |
Final | 1 | % 30 |
total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 70 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 30 | |
total | % 100 |
Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
Course Hours | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 1 | 14 | 14 |
Homework Assignments | 1 | 14 | 14 |
Preliminary Jury | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Jury | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Total Workload | 60 |