Nutrition and Dietetics | |||||
Bachelor | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 6 |
Course Code: | IRL440 | ||||||||
Course Name: | Politics and Society in Eurasia | ||||||||
Course Semester: | Spring | ||||||||
Course Credits: |
|
||||||||
Language of instruction: | EN | ||||||||
Course Requisites: | |||||||||
Does the Course Require Work Experience?: | No | ||||||||
Type of course: | University Elective | ||||||||
Course Level: |
|
||||||||
Mode of Delivery: | Face to face | ||||||||
Course Coordinator : | Dr.Öğr.Üyesi HABİBE ÖZDAL | ||||||||
Course Lecturer(s): |
Dr.Öğr.Üyesi HABİBE ÖZDAL |
||||||||
Course Assistants: |
Course Objectives: | Bu ders, Sovyetler Birliği'nin çöküşünü ve sonuçlarını Sovyet Sonrası alana odaklanarak anlamak ve analiz etmek için bir çerçeve sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır.1991 yılından bu yana gerçekleşen yeni politikalar, geçişler ve dönüşümler ders boyunca incelenecektir. Rusya ve eski Sovyet alanındaki stratejik, politik, ekonomik, etnik, küresel ve bölgesel değişiklikler ele alınacaktır. Ayrıca, klanların, ağların ve yeni bağımsız devletlerdeki yolsuzluğun etkisi de araştırılacaktır. Rusya'nın bölgesel politikaları, özellikle enerji ve entegrasyon politikaları ile uluslararası aktörlerin (NATO ve AB gibi) Avrasya'ya yönelik politikaları incelenecektir. |
Course Content: | Mapping Eurasia; From Communism to Western Democracy: Global Balances from the Cold War to European Union; Hard and Soft Security Issues; Civil Society in Eurasia. |
The students who have succeeded in this course;
|
Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
1) | Identifying Main Issues in Eurasian Politics | None |
2) | Dissolution of the Soviet Union | *Stephen F. Cohen, “Was the Soviet System Reformable?”, Slavic Review, Vol. 63, No. 3, 2004, pp. 459-488 *Astrid S. Tuminez, “Nationalism, Ethnic Pressures, and the Breakup of the Soviet Union”, Journal of Cold War Studies, Vol. 5, No. 4, Fall 2003, pp. 81-136 |
3) | Political Transformation Process of the Russian Federation and the Newly Independent States | Brown, 2001, ss. 17-96 |
4) | Economic Transformation Process of the Russian Federation and the Newly Independent States | * Anders Aslund, “Why Has Russia’s Economic Transformation Been So Arduous?”, Carnegie Endowment For International Peace, 1999. * Sergei Guriev & Andrei Rachinsky, “The Role of Oligarchs in Russian Capitalism,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2005, pp. 131-150 |
5) | Economic and Political Developments in Russia During Putin Terms | * Angela E. Stent, “Restoration and Revolution in Putin’s Foreign Policy”, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol.63, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1089-1106 * Natalia Morozova, “Geopolitics, Eurasianism and Russian Foreign Policy under Putin”, Geopolitics, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2009, pp.667-686 * Andrei Tsygankov, “Vladimir Putin’s Vision of Russia as a Normal Great Power”, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2005, pp. 132-158 |
6) | Dynamics of the Color Revolutions in Post-Soviet Space | * David Lane, “‘Colored Revolution’ as a Political Phenomenon,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Vol. 25, No. 2-3, 2009, pp. 113-135. * Donnacha Ó Beacháin, “Roses and Tulips: Dynamics of Regime Change in Georgia and Kyrgyzstan,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Vol. 2, No. 2-3, 2009, pp. 199-226. * Paul D’Anieri, “What Has Changed in Ukrainian Politics?: Assessing the Implications of the Orange Revolution”, Problems of Post-Communism, Vol. 52, No. 5, 2005, pp. 82-91 |
7) | Midterm Exam | None |
8) | Politics, Conflicts, and ‘Frozen’ Conflicts in Eurasia | * Stephen Blank, “Russia and Black Sea’s Frozen Conflicts in Strategic Perspective”, Mediterranean Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 23-54 * Stefan Wolf, “A Resolvable Frozen Conflict? Designing a Settlement for Transnistria”, Nationality Papers, Vol. 39, No. 6, 2001, pp. 863-870 * William H. Hill, “Reflections on Negotiation and Mediation: The Frozen Conflicts and European Security”, Demokratizatsiya, Vol. 18, No. 3, (Summer 2010, pp. 219-227 |
9) | Integration Policies of the International Actors Toward Post-Soviet Space | * Mark Kramer, “Russian Foreign Policy Toward the Commonwealth of Independent States: Recent Trends and Future Prospects”, Problems of Post-Communism, Vol. 55, No. 6, 2008, pp. 3-19 * Marcin Lapczynski, “The European Union’s Eastern Partnership: Chances and Perspectives”, Caucasian Review of International Affairs, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2009, pp. 143-155 * George Christou, “European Union Security Logics to the East: The European Neighborhood Policy and the Eastern Partnership”, European Security, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2010, pp. 413-430 |
10) | The Evolution of the Russia-NATO Relations Since 1991 | * Dmitry Polikanov, “NATO-Russia Relations: Present and Future”, Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2004, pp. 479-497 * Oksana Antonenko & Bastian Giegerich, “Rebooting NATO-Russia Relations”, Survival, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2009, pp. 13-21 |
11) | Russia-EU Relations in the Context of Eurasia | * Hiski Haukkala, “From Cooperative to Contested Europe? The Conflict in Ukraine as a Culmination of a Long-Term Crisis in EU–Russia Relations”, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2015, pp. 25-40 * Fyodor Lukyanov, “Russia–EU: The Partnership That Went Astray”, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol.60, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1107-1119 |
12) | Energy Politics in the Eurasia: Energy as a Foreign Policy Tool | * F. Stephen Larrabee, “Russia, Ukraine, and Central Europe: The Return of Geopolitics”, Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 63, No. 2, 2010, pp. 33-52 * Dmitri Trenin, “The Ukraine Crisis and the Resumption of Great-Power Rivalry”, Carnegie Moscow Center, 2014. * David A. Deese, “Energy: Economics, Politics, and Security”, International Security, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 140-153 * Bertil Nygren, “Putin’s Use of Natural Gas to Reintegrate the CIS Region,” Problems of Post-Communism, Vol. 55, July/August 2008, pp. 3-15 |
13) | Turkey-Russia Relations after the Cold War | * Şener Aktürk, Turkis-Russian relations after the Cold War (1992-2002), Turkish Studies, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2006, pp. 337-364 * Ziya Öniş and Şuhnaz Yılmaz, “Turkey and Russia in a Shifting Global Order: Co-operation, Conflict and Asymmetric Interdependence in a Turbulent Region”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2016, pp. 71-95 |
14) | Overall Assessment of Eurasian Politics | None |
15) | Final Exam | None |
Course Notes / Textbooks: | Archie Brown, ed., Contemporary Russian Politics, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001 |
References: | Yok-None |
Learning Outcomes | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Outcomes | ||||||||
1) Graduates have the knowledge of attaining scientific knowledge in the field, monitoring, evaluating and applying current literature. | ||||||||
2) Graduates provide preventive health education for individual, family and community by using the information obtained in health field. | ||||||||
3) Graduates take responsibility as individuals and team members to solve complex and unforeseen problems encountered in the field of practice. | ||||||||
5) Graduates evaluates advanced knowledge and skills in the field of health with a critical approach. | ||||||||
6) Graduates transfer information and solution proposal for problems to people and institutions concerned about health field in written and verbally; listen to the thoughts, expectations and expectations of the people and institutions concerned. | ||||||||
7) Graduates become a role model for colleagues and society through Professional identity. | ||||||||
8) Graduates are competent enough to understand the anatomy, physiological functions and behavior of healthy individuals and/or the patients; it is empowering to understand the relationship between the individual's health and the physical and social environment. | ||||||||
9) As an individual, he acts in accordance with laws, regulations, legislation and professional codes of ethics regarding his duties, rights and responsibilities. | ||||||||
10) Cooperate with persons from related disciplines and act in accordance with social, scientific, cultural and ethical values at the stages of data collection, interpretation, application and announcement of results related to the health field. |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
1) | Graduates have the knowledge of attaining scientific knowledge in the field, monitoring, evaluating and applying current literature. | |
2) | Graduates provide preventive health education for individual, family and community by using the information obtained in health field. | |
3) | Graduates take responsibility as individuals and team members to solve complex and unforeseen problems encountered in the field of practice. | |
5) | Graduates evaluates advanced knowledge and skills in the field of health with a critical approach. | |
6) | Graduates transfer information and solution proposal for problems to people and institutions concerned about health field in written and verbally; listen to the thoughts, expectations and expectations of the people and institutions concerned. | |
7) | Graduates become a role model for colleagues and society through Professional identity. | |
8) | Graduates are competent enough to understand the anatomy, physiological functions and behavior of healthy individuals and/or the patients; it is empowering to understand the relationship between the individual's health and the physical and social environment. | |
9) | As an individual, he acts in accordance with laws, regulations, legislation and professional codes of ethics regarding his duties, rights and responsibilities. | |
10) | Cooperate with persons from related disciplines and act in accordance with social, scientific, cultural and ethical values at the stages of data collection, interpretation, application and announcement of results related to the health field. |
Expression | |
Lesson | |
Reading | |
Q&A / Discussion |
Written Exam (Open-ended questions, multiple choice, true-false, matching, fill in the blanks, sequencing) |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Attendance | 1 | % 20 |
Midterms | 1 | % 40 |
Final | 1 | % 40 |
total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 60 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 40 | |
total | % 100 |
Activities | Number of Activities | Workload |
Course Hours | 15 | 45 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 42 |
Midterms | 14 | 42 |
Final | 14 | 42 |
Total Workload | 171 |