Architecture
Bachelor TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 QF-EHEA: First Cycle EQF-LLL: Level 6

General course introduction information

Course Code: MİMB411
Course Name: Hesaplamalı Tasarım Kuramı ve Uygulamaları
Course Semester: Fall
Course Credits:
Theoretical Practical Credit ECTS
1 2 2 2
Language of instruction: TR-EN
Course Requisites:
Does the Course Require Work Experience?: No
Type of course: Compulsory
Course Level:
Bachelor TR-NQF-HE:6. Master`s Degree QF-EHEA:First Cycle EQF-LLL:6. Master`s Degree
Mode of Delivery: Face to face
Course Coordinator : Ar.Gör. AYŞE TUĞÇE BALABAN
Course Lecturer(s):





Course Assistants:

Course Objective and Content

Course Objectives: To provide the ability to improve architectural design practice with 3D modeling
Course Content: Drawing and modeling any plan with Rhino and working with section and view perspectives, working with amorphous structures and introducing the Grasshopper interface

Learning Outcomes

The students who have succeeded in this course;
Learning Outcomes
1 - Knowledge
Theoretical - Conceptual
1) Computational design logic
2 - Skills
Cognitive - Practical
1) Ability to create 3D models with Rhino
2) Amorphous surface designs and Grasshopper interface
3) Rendering works with Rhino
3 - Competences
Communication and Social Competence
Learning Competence
Field Specific Competence
Competence to Work Independently and Take Responsibility

Lesson Plan

Week Subject Related Preparation
1) Meeting, introduction of Rhino software Gramazio F., Kohler M., Langenberg S. 2014. Fabricate: Negotiating Design and Making.
2) Rhinoceros interface and basic commands Iwamoto L. 2009. Digital Fabrications: Architectural and Material Techniques.
3) Drawing a simple plan and creating layers with basic Rhino commands Sakamoto T. 2008. From Control to Design: Parametric / Algorithmic Architecture.
4) Creation of a small house model and drawings of stairs (different drawing techniques with shortcut Rhino commands) Dunn N. 2012. Digital Fabrication in Architecture.
5) Creating graphics and diagrams from the model Stacey M. 2013. Prorotyping Architecture.
6) Study of topography and amorphous structures Stacey M. 2013. Prorotyping Architecture.
7) Midterm exam No
8) Grasshopper interface, basic commands and definitions Leach N., Turnbull D., Williams C. 2004. Digital Tectonics.
9) Basic Grasshopper commands, surface and mesh Leach N., Turnbull D., Williams C. 2004. Digital Tectonics.
10) Current project and application examples in the field of computational design Brookes A. J., Poole D. 2003. Innovation in Architecture.
11) Final project definition, project teams and organizations Brookes A. J., Poole D. 2003. Innovation in Architecture.
12) Rendering of projects Castle H., Kestelier X., Peters B. 2013. Special Issue: Computation Works: The Building of Algorthmic Thought. AD, 83:2.
13) Preparing projects for laser cutting and 3D printing production Castle H., Kestelier X., Peters B. 2013. Special Issue: Computation Works: The Building of Algorthmic Thought. AD, 83:2.
14) Render and Photoshop, Grasshopper facade design views and project final touches No

Sources

Course Notes / Textbooks: Gramazio F., Kohler M., Langenberg S. 2014. Fabricate: Negotiating Design and Making.
Iwamoto L. 2009. Digital Fabrications: Architectural and Material Techniques.
Sakamoto T. 2008. From Control to Design: Parametric / Algorithmic Architecture.
Dunn N. 2012. Digital Fabrication in Architecture.
Stacey M. 2013. Prorotyping Architecture.
Leach N., Turnbull D., Williams C. 2004. Digital Tectonics.
Brookes A. J., Poole D. 2003. Innovation in Architecture.
Castle H., Kestelier X., Peters B. 2013. Special Issue: Computation Works: The Building of Algorthmic Thought. AD, 83:2.
References: Gramazio F., Kohler M., Langenberg S. 2014. Fabricate: Negotiating Design and Making.
Iwamoto L. 2009. Digital Fabrications: Architectural and Material Techniques.
Sakamoto T. 2008. From Control to Design: Parametric / Algorithmic Architecture.
Dunn N. 2012. Digital Fabrication in Architecture.
Stacey M. 2013. Prorotyping Architecture.
Leach N., Turnbull D., Williams C. 2004. Digital Tectonics.
Brookes A. J., Poole D. 2003. Innovation in Architecture.
Castle H., Kestelier X., Peters B. 2013. Special Issue: Computation Works: The Building of Algorthmic Thought. AD, 83:2.

Course-Program Learning Outcome Relationship

Learning Outcomes

1

3

4

2

Program Outcomes
1) - Gaining discursive, theoretical and factual information from various environments, in local, national and global context for related field, architectural design/ planning/ design activities and researches, she has required ability and comprehension to reflect the information on academic environment.
2) - Has intellectual, discursive, scientific, technologic, esthetic, artistic, historic and cultural information and comprehension about related field.
3) - Has knowledge and understanding on human and community oriented and sensitive to environment (natural and built) architectural design/ planning/ design/ research methods on the related field.
4) - Has multidimensional knowledge and understanding on economics, topics related to disasters and environmental and societal sustainability principles and standards.
5) - They have knowledge about the principles, laws, regulations and standards related to their field.
6) - Has knowledge and understanding about institutional and ethical values related to the concerned field.
7) - Has knowledge and understanding about the place / importance of the related field in its historical, geographical, social and cultural context.
8) - Has ability to develop concepts in architectural design/ planning/ design fields.
9) - Has ability to provide integrity between discourse, theory and practise for architectural design / planning / design activities and researches.
10) - Has ability to identify facts, potential, problems and required researches for these in architectural design/ planning/ design issues.

Course - Learning Outcome Relationship

No Effect 1 Lowest 2 Low 3 Average 4 High 5 Highest
           
Program Outcomes Level of Contribution
1) - Gaining discursive, theoretical and factual information from various environments, in local, national and global context for related field, architectural design/ planning/ design activities and researches, she has required ability and comprehension to reflect the information on academic environment. 3
2) - Has intellectual, discursive, scientific, technologic, esthetic, artistic, historic and cultural information and comprehension about related field. 4
3) - Has knowledge and understanding on human and community oriented and sensitive to environment (natural and built) architectural design/ planning/ design/ research methods on the related field. 3
4) - Has multidimensional knowledge and understanding on economics, topics related to disasters and environmental and societal sustainability principles and standards. 1
5) - They have knowledge about the principles, laws, regulations and standards related to their field. 4
6) - Has knowledge and understanding about institutional and ethical values related to the concerned field. 4
7) - Has knowledge and understanding about the place / importance of the related field in its historical, geographical, social and cultural context. 3
8) - Has ability to develop concepts in architectural design/ planning/ design fields. 3
9) - Has ability to provide integrity between discourse, theory and practise for architectural design / planning / design activities and researches. 5
10) - Has ability to identify facts, potential, problems and required researches for these in architectural design/ planning/ design issues. 4

Learning Activity and Teaching Methods

Expression
Individual study and homework
Lesson
Homework
Application (Modelling, Design, Model, Simulation, Experiment etc.)
Web Based Learning

Assessment & Grading Methods and Criteria

Homework
Application

Assessment & Grading

Semester Requirements Number of Activities Level of Contribution
Application 8 % 16
Homework Assignments 8 % 16
Midterms 1 % 28
Final 1 % 40
total % 100
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK % 60
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK % 40
total % 100

Workload and ECTS Credit Grading

Activities Number of Activities Duration (Hours) Workload
Course Hours 14 3 42
Application 8 1 8
Study Hours Out of Class 14 1 14
Homework Assignments 8 1 8
Midterms 1 1 1
Final 1 1 1
Total Workload 74