PhD in Architecture with a bachelor's degree | |||||
PhD | TR-NQF-HE: Level 8 | QF-EHEA: Third Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 8 |
Course Code: | MİM606 | ||||||||
Course Name: | Typology Studies | ||||||||
Course Semester: | Spring | ||||||||
Course Credits: |
|
||||||||
Language of instruction: | TR | ||||||||
Course Requisites: | |||||||||
Does the Course Require Work Experience?: | No | ||||||||
Type of course: | Department Elective | ||||||||
Course Level: |
|
||||||||
Mode of Delivery: | |||||||||
Course Coordinator : | Dr.Öğr.Üyesi ÖZLEM ÇİÇEK ÜNAL | ||||||||
Course Lecturer(s): |
|
||||||||
Course Assistants: |
Course Objectives: | The aim of this course is to present the initial studies on the concepts of type and typology in architecture, the development of these studies over time, contemporary typology research, and the areas where these studies are applied in architectural practice. The course content is delivered through theoretical lectures, discussions, and the examination and analysis of both analytical and generative typology approaches. |
Course Content: | This course covers the historical background of the concepts of type and typology in architecture, their role in modern architectural discourse, and their contemporary applications. Fundamental approaches to typology are discussed through theoretical texts and case studies. Analytical and generative typology methods are examined and their place in the architectural design process is evaluated. |
The students who have succeeded in this course;
|
Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
1) | Introduction to the terminology and concepts of Type and Typology | |
2) | Analytical and Generative Typology Studies | |
3) | Overview of typology studies: First, Second and Third Typolgy Studies | |
4) | Overview of typology studies: First, Second, and Third Typology Periods | |
5) | Concepts of type and style | |
6) | Generative typology sturdies: Late Ottoman and early republican period type projects | |
7) | Typological studies on housing | |
8) | Urban typology studies | |
9) | Discussions on examples of analytical typological studies | |
10) | Discussions on examples of analytical typological studies | |
11) | Discussion and preliminary presentation on assignment topic | |
12) | Discussion on assignment topic | |
13) | Discussion on assignment topic | |
14) | Discussion on assignment topic |
Course Notes / Textbooks: | Bingöl, Ö. (2007). Mimarlıkta Tip Kavramı ve Tipoloji, (Doktora tezi), İstanbul: Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Cataldai, G., Maffei, G. L., & Vaccaro, P. (2002). Saverio Muratori and the Italian school of planning typology. Urban Morphology, 6(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v6i1.3899 Madrazo, L. (1999). Types and Instances: a paradigm for teaching design with computers. Design Studies, 20(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00033-7 Özbil, A.N. (2002). Sedad Hakkı Eldem’s Typological Analysis of the “Turkish House” as a Tool for an Operative Design Methodology, (Yüksek lisans tezi), Ankara: ODTÜ, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Temizel, N. P., & Bilsel, F. C. (2022). İtalyan Tipo-morfoloji Ekolünde Tip ve Tipoloji Kavramları. Türkiye Kentsel Morfoloji Ağı, 127–141. Vidler, A. (1977). the third typology. Oppositions, 7, 288–294. Tuztaşı, U. (2009). Koruma ve Tarihsel Açıdan İdealleş(-tiril-)miş “Türk Evi”nin Arkeolojisi: Osmanlı Evinin Fragmanları ve Tipolojik Elemanları, (Doktora tezi), İstanbul: Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. |
References: | Bingöl, Ö. (2007). Mimarlıkta Tip Kavramı ve Tipoloji, (Doktora tezi), İstanbul: Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Cataldai, G., Maffei, G. L., & Vaccaro, P. (2002). Saverio Muratori and the Italian school of planning typology. Urban Morphology, 6(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v6i1.3899 Madrazo, L. (1999). Types and Instances: a paradigm for teaching design with computers. Design Studies, 20(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00033-7 Özbil, A.N. (2002). Sedad Hakkı Eldem’s Typological Analysis of the “Turkish House” as a Tool for an Operative Design Methodology, (Yüksek lisans tezi), Ankara: ODTÜ, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Temizel, N. P., & Bilsel, F. C. (2022). İtalyan Tipo-morfoloji Ekolünde Tip ve Tipoloji Kavramları. Türkiye Kentsel Morfoloji Ağı, 127–141. Vidler, A. (1977). the third typology. Oppositions, 7, 288–294. Tuztaşı, U. (2009). Koruma ve Tarihsel Açıdan İdealleş(-tiril-)miş “Türk Evi”nin Arkeolojisi: Osmanlı Evinin Fragmanları ve Tipolojik Elemanları, (Doktora tezi), İstanbul: Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. |
Learning Outcomes | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Outcomes |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution |
Expression | |
Brainstorming/ Six tihnking hats | |
Individual study and homework | |
Lesson | |
Reading | |
Homework | |
Q&A / Discussion |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Attendance | 1 | % 10 |
Final | 1 | % 90 |
total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 10 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 90 | |
total | % 100 |
Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 4 | 56 |
Homework Assignments | 7 | 4 | 28 |
Paper Submission | 1 | 30 | 30 |
Final | 1 | 10 | 10 |
Total Workload | 166 |