ISTANBUL OKAN UNIVERSITY INFORMATION PACKAGE / COURSE CATALOGUE
| Public Law (non-thesis) | |||||
| Master | TR-NQF-HE: Level 7 | QF-EHEA: Second Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 7 | ||
General course introduction information
| Course Code: | KHYL526 | ||||||||
| Course Name: | Individual Application Procedure to The Constitutional Court | ||||||||
| Course Semester: | Fall | ||||||||
| Course Credits: |
|
||||||||
| Language of instruction: | TR | ||||||||
| Course Requisites: | |||||||||
| Does the Course Require Work Experience?: | No | ||||||||
| Type of course: | Department Elective | ||||||||
| Course Level: |
|
||||||||
| Mode of Delivery: | Face to face | ||||||||
| Course Coordinator : | Dr.Öğr.Üyesi SİNEM ŞİRİN | ||||||||
| Course Lecturer(s): |
|
||||||||
| Course Assistants: |
Course Objective and Content
| Course Objectives: | In this course, it is aimed that the individual application procedure, which provides the remedy of violations of fundamental rights by state organs and especially by judicial organs, is learnt in detail by the practitioners and the developing jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court on procedural law is discussed. |
| Course Content: | In this course, the emergence and basic features of the individual application to the Constitutional Court, application conditions and admissibility criteria, types of decisions and the Court's jurisprudence on procedural law will be explained and discussed. |
Learning Outcomes
The students who have succeeded in this course;
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lesson Plan
| Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
| 1) | Definition, Purpose, Characteristics and Emergence of the Individual Application Procedure | |
| 2) | Basic Features of the Individual Application to the Constitutional Court and Examination of Applications | |
| 3) | Admissibility Criteria in the Individual Application Procedure to the Constitutional Court (in terms of time, place, subject and person) | |
| 4) | Admissibility Criteria in the Individual Application Procedure to the Constitutional Court (in terms of time, place, subject and person) | |
| 5) | Admissibility Criteria in the Individual Application Procedure to the Constitutional Court (in terms of time, place, subject and person) | |
| 6) | Exhaustion of remedies and their exceptions | |
| 7) | Application period | |
| 8) | The criterion of not being manifestly unfounded | |
| 9) | Constitutional and personal importance and the criterion of significant damage | |
| 10) | Types of Decision in Individual Application Procedure | |
| 11) | Sample judgement reviews | |
| 12) | Judgement Review/Presentations | |
| 13) | Judgement Review/Presentations | |
| 14) | Judgement Review/Presentations |
Sources
| Course Notes / Textbooks: | T.C. 1982 Anayasası Metni, 6216 sayılı Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kuruluşu ve Yargılama Usulleri Hakkında Kanun, Anayasa Mahkemesi İçtüzüğü, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesi, Anayasa Mahkemesi ve İHAM İçtihatları |
| References: | • Ece Göztepe, Anayasa Şikayeti, Ankara Üniversitesi Yayını, 1998. • Ece Göztepe, “Türkiye’de Anayasa Mahkemesi’ne Bireysel Başvuru Hakkının (Anayasa Şikâyeti) 6216 Sayılı Kanun Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi”, TBB Dergisi, Sayı: 95, 2011, ss. 13-40. • Fazıl Sağlam, “Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin Ürettiği Yapay Bir Kavram: Ortak Koruma Alanı”, Metin Günday Armağanı, Atılım Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2. Cilt, ss. 1101-1164, 2020. • Korkut Kanadoğlu, Anayasa Mahkemesi'ne Bireysel Başvuru, XII Levha Yayınları, 2015. • Musa Sağlam (ed.), Bireysel Başvuru İnceleme Usulü ve Kabul Edilebilirlik Kriterleri, Anayasa Mahkemesi Yayını, 2013. • Sibel İnceoğlu, Anayasa Mahkemesi'ne Bireysel Başvuru Türkiye ve Latin Modelleri, XII Levha Yayınları, 2017. • Tolga Şirin, Türkiye’de Anayasa Şikayeti, XII Levha Yayınları, 2013. • Tolga Şirin, Bireysel Başvuru Usul Hukuku, Avrupa Konseyi Yayını, 2018. • Ulaş Karan, Anayasa Mahkemesi'ne Bireysel Başvuru Rehberi, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi yayınları, 2015. |
Course-Program Learning Outcome Relationship
| Learning Outcomes | 1 |
2 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Outcomes | ||||||||
| 1) Developing expertise-level knowledge of concepts, institutions, and methods related to the field of public law and its sub-disciplines | ||||||||
| 2) Using the advanced knowledge acquired in the field of public law and its sub-disciplines to analyze topics and issues related to legal theory and practice | ||||||||
| 3) Conducting a specialized study in the field of public law and its sub-disciplines independently | ||||||||
| 4) Communicating the current developments in legal theory and practice in a systematic manner, both in writing and orally, using the advanced knowledge acquired in the field of public law and its subdisciplines | ||||||||
| 5) Critically questioning legal concepts, institutions, established legal practices, and legal rules, and developing them when necessary | ||||||||
| 6) Utilizing research skills such as source scanning, organizing, and information transfer/presentation by leveraging technology. | ||||||||
| 7) To express the research findings orally and in writing at an expert level, using academic language and in accordance with ethical principles | ||||||||
| 8) Conducting a research project in the field of public law, either independently or within a group, using appropriate methods. | ||||||||
| 9) Analyzing and interpreting public law concepts in an analytical manner at an international level | ||||||||
Course - Learning Outcome Relationship
| No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
| Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
| 1) | Developing expertise-level knowledge of concepts, institutions, and methods related to the field of public law and its sub-disciplines | |
| 2) | Using the advanced knowledge acquired in the field of public law and its sub-disciplines to analyze topics and issues related to legal theory and practice | |
| 3) | Conducting a specialized study in the field of public law and its sub-disciplines independently | |
| 4) | Communicating the current developments in legal theory and practice in a systematic manner, both in writing and orally, using the advanced knowledge acquired in the field of public law and its subdisciplines | |
| 5) | Critically questioning legal concepts, institutions, established legal practices, and legal rules, and developing them when necessary | |
| 6) | Utilizing research skills such as source scanning, organizing, and information transfer/presentation by leveraging technology. | |
| 7) | To express the research findings orally and in writing at an expert level, using academic language and in accordance with ethical principles | |
| 8) | Conducting a research project in the field of public law, either independently or within a group, using appropriate methods. | |
| 9) | Analyzing and interpreting public law concepts in an analytical manner at an international level |
Learning Activity and Teaching Methods
| Expression | |
| Lesson | |
| Reading | |
| Homework | |
| Q&A / Discussion |
Assessment & Grading Methods and Criteria
| Written Exam (Open-ended questions, multiple choice, true-false, matching, fill in the blanks, sequencing) | |
| Presentation |
Assessment & Grading
| Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
| Presentation | 1 | % 40 |
| Final | 1 | % 60 |
| total | % 100 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 40 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 60 | |
| total | % 100 | |
Workload and ECTS Credit Grading
| Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
| Course Hours | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Presentations / Seminar | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Final | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Total Workload | 74 | ||