Quality Management in Health with thesis | |||||
Master | TR-NQF-HE: Level 7 | QF-EHEA: Second Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 7 |
Course Code: | SAY532 | ||||||||
Course Name: | Healthcare Policies | ||||||||
Course Semester: |
Fall |
||||||||
Course Credits: |
|
||||||||
Language of instruction: | |||||||||
Course Requisites: | |||||||||
Does the Course Require Work Experience?: | No | ||||||||
Type of course: | Department Elective | ||||||||
Course Level: |
|
||||||||
Mode of Delivery: | |||||||||
Course Coordinator : | Prof. Dr. MİTHAT KIYAK | ||||||||
Course Lecturer(s): |
Dr.Öğr.Üyesi YILDIRIM BEYAZIT GÜLHAN |
||||||||
Course Assistants: |
Course Objectives: | The aim of this course is to examine and evaluate health policy analysis theoretically and methodologically. Health policy analysis course, which is a multi-disciplinary field; It aims to explain the interaction between actors, institutions, content, interests and ideas in the policy process. |
Course Content: | As part of this course; Health policy analysis will be discussed theoretically and methodologically within the framework of the four basic elements of health and health services (delivery, organization, financing and reforms of health services). |
The students who have succeeded in this course;
|
Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
1) | Health policy analysis: a general introduction and framework | . |
2) | Process and challenges in health policy analysis | . |
3) | Models and methods in health policy analysis | . |
4) | Case analysis: Health reforms | . |
5) | Case analysis: Health financing | . |
6) | Case analysis: Delivery of health services | . |
7) | Case analysis: Organization of health services | . |
8) | Team work | . |
9) | Team work | . |
10) | Team work | . |
11) | Team work | . |
12) | Team work | . |
13) | Team work | . |
14) | Team work | . |
Course Notes / Textbooks: | Abel-Smith B. (1994). An Introduction to Health: Policy, Planning and Financing. Longman Group Limited, Essex. Aktan CC ve Saran U. (ed). (2007). Sağlık Yönetimi ve Sağlık Ekonomisi. Aura Kitapları. Barker C. (1996). The Health Policy Process. Sage Publications, London. Collins T. (2005). Health Policy Analysis: A Simple Tool for Policy Makers. Public Health, 119: 192-196. Garrido MV et al. (2008). Health Technology Assessment and Health Policy Making in Europe, WHO Observatory on HealthSystems, Geneva. pp. 19-31. |
References: | Gilson L and Raphaely N. (2008). The Terrain of Health Policy Analysis in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Review of Published Literature 1994-2007. Health Policy and Planning. 23: 294-307. Janovsky K (ed) (1996). Health Policy and Systems Development. WHO, Geneva.8. Kutzin, J.(,2008). Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Health Financing Systems, In: Kutzin J et al. (Eds). Implementing Health Financing Reform, WHO Observatory on Health Systems, Geneva |
Learning Outcomes | 1 |
---|---|
Program Outcomes | |
1) Identify and analyze problems in healthcare delivery Can lead in the solution of problems related to quality management in the health sector, develop strategic approaches, and produce solutions related to problems. It can follow scientific and legal developments related to quality management in health, interpret it by combining it with information from different disciplines and create new information. It gives importance to team work and shares information. | |
2) By making due diligence using research and development methods, it makes new arrangements and improvements in the light of the data obtained, and solves the problems that arise using these methods. It gives importance to patient, employee and facility security, acts within the principles of medical ethics, contributes to the development of patient-patient relatives-health worker relations. Can establish quality management-accreditation systems in health, supervise, continuously improve and develop these systems in all areas of the health sector. It increases efficiency. Can manage scientific studies related to Quality in Health independently. |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
1) | Identify and analyze problems in healthcare delivery Can lead in the solution of problems related to quality management in the health sector, develop strategic approaches, and produce solutions related to problems. It can follow scientific and legal developments related to quality management in health, interpret it by combining it with information from different disciplines and create new information. It gives importance to team work and shares information. | |
2) | By making due diligence using research and development methods, it makes new arrangements and improvements in the light of the data obtained, and solves the problems that arise using these methods. It gives importance to patient, employee and facility security, acts within the principles of medical ethics, contributes to the development of patient-patient relatives-health worker relations. Can establish quality management-accreditation systems in health, supervise, continuously improve and develop these systems in all areas of the health sector. It increases efficiency. Can manage scientific studies related to Quality in Health independently. |
Lesson | |
Homework |
Written Exam (Open-ended questions, multiple choice, true-false, matching, fill in the blanks, sequencing) | |
Oral Examination | |
Homework | |
Presentation |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Attendance | 14 | % 10 |
Homework Assignments | 14 | % 20 |
Midterms | 1 | % 30 |
Final | 1 | % 40 |
total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 60 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 40 | |
total | % 100 |