ISTANBUL OKAN UNIVERSITY INFORMATION PACKAGE / COURSE CATALOGUE
| Architecture | |||||
| Bachelor | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 6 | ||
General course introduction information
| Course Code: | MİMBS501 | ||||||||
| Course Name: | Global Discussions On Architecture | ||||||||
| Course Semester: | Spring | ||||||||
| Course Credits: |
|
||||||||
| Language of instruction: | TR-EN | ||||||||
| Course Requisites: | |||||||||
| Does the Course Require Work Experience?: | No | ||||||||
| Type of course: | Department Elective | ||||||||
| Course Level: |
|
||||||||
| Mode of Delivery: | Face to face | ||||||||
| Course Coordinator : | Dr.Öğr.Üyesi EDA ÖZSOY | ||||||||
| Course Lecturer(s): |
Prof. Dr. HALİL SEMİH ERYILDIZ Dr.Öğr.Üyesi EDA ÖZSOY |
||||||||
| Course Assistants: |
Course Objective and Content
| Course Objectives: | To develop an understanding about architecture and its global context, to run discussions on contemporary issues and relations of architecture with other disciplines and areas. |
| Course Content: | Architecture as both an anonymous and complicated field of production needs to be re-described and discussed parallel to the global changes in all aspects. This course aims to read and discuss current agenda of today’s world and to see its reflections on / relations with architecture |
Learning Outcomes
The students who have succeeded in this course;
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lesson Plan
| Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
| 1) | Introduction | |
| 2) | Dynamics of Globalization | |
| 3) | Dynamics of Globalization | |
| 4) | Key Concepts on Global Architecture Issues | A.Krista Sykes(ed.) (2017). "Yeni Bir Gündem İnşa Etmek: Mimarlık Kuramı 1993-2009" |
| 5) | Key Concepts on Global Architecture Issues | A.Krista Sykes(ed.) (2017). "Yeni Bir Gündem İnşa Etmek: Mimarlık Kuramı 1993-2009" |
| 6) | Key Concepts on Global Architecture Issues | A.Krista Sykes(ed.) (2017). "Yeni Bir Gündem İnşa Etmek: Mimarlık Kuramı 1993-2009" |
| 7) | Networks, Actors, Discourses and Practices | Tanyeli, U. (2017). Yıkarak Yapmak. |
| 8) | Mid-Term Exam / Presentations | |
| 9) | Networks, Actors, Discourses and Practices | Tanyeli, U. (2017). Yıkarak Yapmak. |
| 10) | Networks, Actors, Discourses and Practices | Tanyeli, U. (2017). Yıkarak Yapmak. |
| 11) | Networks, Actors, Discourses and Practices | Tanyeli, U. (2017). Yıkarak Yapmak. |
| 12) | Future Envisions on Architecture | Hossein Sadri, “Mimarlık ve İnsan Hakları” |
| 13) | Future Envisions on Architecture | Hossein Sadri, “Mimarlık ve İnsan Hakları” |
| 14) | Future Envisions on Architecture | Hossein Sadri, “Mimarlık ve İnsan Hakları” |
Sources
| Course Notes / Textbooks: | Evet |
| References: | Spector, T. (2001). The Ethical Architect: The Dilemma of Contemporary Practice. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. Spencer, D. (2018). Neoliberalizmin Mimarlığı: Çağdaş Mimarlığın Denetim ve İtaat Aracına Dönüşme Süreci. İletişim Yayınları: İstanbul Hubbard, P. (2011). Key thinkers on space and place. Los Angeles: Sage. Rauterberg, H., Aston, P., & Holtz, C. (2012). Talking Architecture: Interviews with architects. Munich: Prestel. Torlak, S., Kulak, Ö. (ed.) (2014). Mekân Meselesi. Tekin Yayınevi, İstanbul Lefebvre, H. (2015). Mekânın Üretimi. Sel Yayıncılık, İstanbul. Mishchenko, E.D. (2018). Kapsayıcı Bir Kent Mümkün mü, Mekanda Adalet Derneği, https://beyond.istanbul/kapsayıcı-bir-kent-mümkün-mü-803a70a80df0 Yırtıcı, H. (2005). Çağdaş Kapitalizmin Mekânsal Örgütlenmesi. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul Tanyeli, U. (2017). Yıkarak Yapmak. Metis Yayınları, İstanbul. Koçak Dilek Özhan, & Koçak Orhan Kemal. (2016). İstanbul Kimin Şehri: Kültür, Tasarım, Seyirlik ve Sermaye. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. Kırlangıç, Ö. (2012) Dar Gelirliler İçin Konut Üretiminde Bir Yöntem Olarak Mimari Tasarımda “Kullanıcı Katılımı”. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, MSGSÜ Mimarlık ABD, Mimari Tasarım Sorunları Programı A.Krista Sykes(ed.) (2017). "Yeni Bir Gündem İnşa Etmek: Mimarlık Kuramı 1993-2009", Küre Yay: Istanbul Pınar Çobanyılmaz Öztürk, “İstanbul’da (Mega) Projeler ve Kentsel Değişim”, Mimar.ist 2017/1 s.47-55 Cihan Uzunçarşılı Baysal, “Kabataş Martı Projesi: İstanbul’un Dubaileştirilmesi ve Mimarın Etiği”, 2016 Hossein Sadri, “Mimarlık ve İnsan Hakları”, Mimarlık Dergisi, No: 365, 2012. |
Course-Program Learning Outcome Relationship
| Learning Outcomes | 1 |
2 |
3 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Outcomes | |||||||||
| 1) - Gaining discursive, theoretical and factual information from various environments, in local, national and global context for related field, architectural design/ planning/ design activities and researches, she has required ability and comprehension to reflect the information on academic environment. | |||||||||
| 2) - Has intellectual, discursive, scientific, technologic, esthetic, artistic, historic and cultural information and comprehension about related field. | |||||||||
| 3) - Has knowledge and understanding on human and community oriented and sensitive to environment (natural and built) architectural design/ planning/ design/ research methods on the related field. | |||||||||
| 4) - Has multidimensional knowledge and understanding on economics, topics related to disasters and environmental and societal sustainability principles and standards. | |||||||||
| 5) - They have knowledge about the principles, laws, regulations and standards related to their field. | |||||||||
| 6) - Has knowledge and understanding about institutional and ethical values related to the concerned field. | |||||||||
| 7) - Has knowledge and understanding about the place / importance of the related field in its historical, geographical, social and cultural context. | |||||||||
| 8) - Has ability to develop concepts in architectural design/ planning/ design fields. | |||||||||
| 9) - Has ability to provide integrity between discourse, theory and practise for architectural design / planning / design activities and researches. | |||||||||
| 10) - Has ability to identify facts, potential, problems and required researches for these in architectural design/ planning/ design issues. | |||||||||
Course - Learning Outcome Relationship
| No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
| Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
| 1) | - Gaining discursive, theoretical and factual information from various environments, in local, national and global context for related field, architectural design/ planning/ design activities and researches, she has required ability and comprehension to reflect the information on academic environment. | 3 |
| 2) | - Has intellectual, discursive, scientific, technologic, esthetic, artistic, historic and cultural information and comprehension about related field. | 3 |
| 3) | - Has knowledge and understanding on human and community oriented and sensitive to environment (natural and built) architectural design/ planning/ design/ research methods on the related field. | 3 |
| 4) | - Has multidimensional knowledge and understanding on economics, topics related to disasters and environmental and societal sustainability principles and standards. | 3 |
| 5) | - They have knowledge about the principles, laws, regulations and standards related to their field. | 3 |
| 6) | - Has knowledge and understanding about institutional and ethical values related to the concerned field. | 3 |
| 7) | - Has knowledge and understanding about the place / importance of the related field in its historical, geographical, social and cultural context. | 3 |
| 8) | - Has ability to develop concepts in architectural design/ planning/ design fields. | 3 |
| 9) | - Has ability to provide integrity between discourse, theory and practise for architectural design / planning / design activities and researches. | 3 |
| 10) | - Has ability to identify facts, potential, problems and required researches for these in architectural design/ planning/ design issues. | 3 |
Learning Activity and Teaching Methods
| Lesson | |
| Project preparation |
Assessment & Grading Methods and Criteria
| Written Exam (Open-ended questions, multiple choice, true-false, matching, fill in the blanks, sequencing) | |
| Individual Project | |
| Presentation |
Assessment & Grading
| Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
| Attendance | 14 | % 15 |
| Quizzes | 1 | % 10 |
| Presentation | 1 | % 15 |
| Project | 1 | % 30 |
| Final | 1 | % 30 |
| total | % 100 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 70 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 30 | |
| total | % 100 | |
Workload and ECTS Credit Grading
| Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
| Course Hours | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Presentations / Seminar | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Homework Assignments | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Final | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Total Workload | 60 | ||