Architecture (English) | |||||
Bachelor | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 6 |
Course Code: | ARCDE502 | ||||||||
Course Name: | Productıon, Consumptıon And The Role Of Archıtect | ||||||||
Course Semester: |
Spring |
||||||||
Course Credits: |
|
||||||||
Language of instruction: | TR-EN | ||||||||
Course Requisites: | |||||||||
Does the Course Require Work Experience?: | No | ||||||||
Type of course: | Department Elective | ||||||||
Course Level: |
|
||||||||
Mode of Delivery: | Face to face | ||||||||
Course Coordinator : | Öğr.Gör. B.Öğretim Elemanı | ||||||||
Course Lecturer(s): | |||||||||
Course Assistants: |
Course Objectives: | To run discussions on multidimensional aspects of space production and to embrace the role of the architect as a subject, producing in these aspects; to develop a critical understanding through architecture/architect that will be traced through both alternative and mainstream modes of architecture composes the content of the course. |
Course Content: | Discussions will be held on the multi-dimensional content of space production. |
The students who have succeeded in this course;
|
Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
1) | Introduction | |
2) | Architecture as a Profession | |
3) | Architecture as a Profession | |
4) | Architecture as a Profession | |
5) | Breaking Points: Changes on Ways of Production | |
6) | Breaking Points: Changes on Ways of Production | |
7) | Breaking Points: Changes on Ways of Production | |
8) | Mid-Term Exam / Presentations | |
9) | The Changing Role of the Architects as an Actor | |
10) | The Changing Role of the Architects as an Actor | |
11) | The Changing Role of the Architects as an Actor | |
12) | Architectural Production: Discourses and Practices | |
13) | Architectural Production: Discourses and Practices | |
14) | Architectural Production: Discourses and Practices |
Course Notes / Textbooks: | Spector, T. (2001). The Ethical Architect: The Dilemma of Contemporary Practice. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. Spencer, D. (2018). Neoliberalizmin Mimarlığı: Çağdaş Mimarlığın Denetim ve İtaat Aracına Dönüşme Süreci. İletişim Yayınları: İstanbul Hubbard, P. (2011). Key Thinkers on Space and Place. Los Angeles: Sage. Rauterberg, H., Aston, P., & Holtz, C. (2012). Talking Architecture: Interviews with architects. Munich: Prestel. Tanyeli, U. (2017). Yıkarak Yapmak. Metis Yayınları, İstanbul. Tanyeli U. (2007). Mimarlığın Aktörleri: Türkiye 1900-2000. İstanbul: Garanti Galeri. A.Krista Sykes(ed.) (2017). "Yeni Bir Gündem İnşa Etmek: Mimarlık Kuramı 1993-2009", Küre Yay: Istanbul Featherstone, M. (2013). Postmodernizm ve Tüketim Kültürü. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yay. Rand, A. (2008). Hayatın Kaynağı. (Dişbudak Belkıs, Çev.). İstanbul: Plato Film Yayınları. Urry, J., & Öğdül Rahmi G. (1999). Mekânları Tüketmek. İstanbul: Ayrıntı. |
References: | Spector, T. (2001). The Ethical Architect: The Dilemma of Contemporary Practice. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. Spencer, D. (2018). Neoliberalizmin Mimarlığı: Çağdaş Mimarlığın Denetim ve İtaat Aracına Dönüşme Süreci. İletişim Yayınları: İstanbul Hubbard, P. (2011). Key Thinkers on Space and Place. Los Angeles: Sage. Rauterberg, H., Aston, P., & Holtz, C. (2012). Talking Architecture: Interviews with architects. Munich: Prestel. Tanyeli, U. (2017). Yıkarak Yapmak. Metis Yayınları, İstanbul. Tanyeli U. (2007). Mimarlığın Aktörleri: Türkiye 1900-2000. İstanbul: Garanti Galeri. A.Krista Sykes(ed.) (2017). "Yeni Bir Gündem İnşa Etmek: Mimarlık Kuramı 1993-2009", Küre Yay: Istanbul Featherstone, M. (2013). Postmodernizm ve Tüketim Kültürü. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yay. Rand, A. (2008). Hayatın Kaynağı. (Dişbudak Belkıs, Çev.). İstanbul: Plato Film Yayınları. Urry, J., & Öğdül Rahmi G. (1999). Mekânları Tüketmek. İstanbul: Ayrıntı. |
Learning Outcomes | 1 |
2 |
3 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Outcomes | |||||||||
1) - Gaining discursive, theoretical and factual information from various environments, in local, national and global context for related field, architectural design/ planning/ design activities and researches, she has required ability and comprehension to reflect the information on academic environment. | |||||||||
2) - Has intellectual, discursive, scientific, technologic, esthetic, artistic, historic and cultural information and comprehension about related field. | |||||||||
3) - Has knowledge and understanding on human and community oriented and sensitive to environment (natural and built) architectural design/ planning/ design/ research methods on the related field. | |||||||||
4) - Has multidimensional knowledge and understanding on economics, topics related to disasters and environmental and societal sustainability principles and standards. | |||||||||
5) - They have knowledge about the principles, laws, regulations and standards related to their field. | |||||||||
6) - Has knowledge and understanding about institutional and ethical values related to the concerned field. | |||||||||
7) - Has knowledge and understanding about the place / importance of the related field in its historical, geographical, social and cultural context. | |||||||||
8) - Has ability to develop concepts in architectural design/ planning/ design fields. | |||||||||
9) - Has ability to provide integrity between discourse, theory and practise for architectural design / planning / design activities and researches. | |||||||||
10) - Has ability to identify facts, potential, problems and required researches for these in architectural design/ planning/ design issues. |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
1) | - Gaining discursive, theoretical and factual information from various environments, in local, national and global context for related field, architectural design/ planning/ design activities and researches, she has required ability and comprehension to reflect the information on academic environment. | |
2) | - Has intellectual, discursive, scientific, technologic, esthetic, artistic, historic and cultural information and comprehension about related field. | |
3) | - Has knowledge and understanding on human and community oriented and sensitive to environment (natural and built) architectural design/ planning/ design/ research methods on the related field. | |
4) | - Has multidimensional knowledge and understanding on economics, topics related to disasters and environmental and societal sustainability principles and standards. | |
5) | - They have knowledge about the principles, laws, regulations and standards related to their field. | |
6) | - Has knowledge and understanding about institutional and ethical values related to the concerned field. | |
7) | - Has knowledge and understanding about the place / importance of the related field in its historical, geographical, social and cultural context. | |
8) | - Has ability to develop concepts in architectural design/ planning/ design fields. | |
9) | - Has ability to provide integrity between discourse, theory and practise for architectural design / planning / design activities and researches. | |
10) | - Has ability to identify facts, potential, problems and required researches for these in architectural design/ planning/ design issues. |
Expression | |
Lesson | |
Group study and homework | |
Reading | |
Project preparation |
Written Exam (Open-ended questions, multiple choice, true-false, matching, fill in the blanks, sequencing) | |
Homework | |
Group project |
Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
Attendance | 14 | % 15 |
Quizzes | 1 | % 10 |
Presentation | 1 | % 15 |
Jury | 1 | % 30 |
Final | 1 | % 30 |
total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 70 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 30 | |
total | % 100 |
Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
Course Hours | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 1 | 14 |
Homework Assignments | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Midterms | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Final | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Total Workload | 48 |