ISTANBUL OKAN UNIVERSITY INFORMATION PACKAGE / COURSE CATALOGUE
| Architecture (English) | |||||
| Bachelor | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 6 | ||
General course introduction information
| Course Code: | ARCDE206 | ||||||||
| Course Name: | Aesthetıcs And Crıtıcısm | ||||||||
| Course Semester: | Fall | ||||||||
| Course Credits: |
|
||||||||
| Language of instruction: | TR-EN | ||||||||
| Course Requisites: | |||||||||
| Does the Course Require Work Experience?: | No | ||||||||
| Type of course: | Department Elective | ||||||||
| Course Level: |
|
||||||||
| Mode of Delivery: | Face to face | ||||||||
| Course Coordinator : | Dr.Öğr.Üyesi NEVBAHAR ATALAY | ||||||||
| Course Lecturer(s): | |||||||||
| Course Assistants: |
Course Objective and Content
| Course Objectives: | Providing students with supportive and knowledge perspectives on free thinking in their professional and daily lives and practices, creativity and expression ways in their designs |
| Course Content: | Quality fields of aesthetics, theories, design culture, conditions of artistic creation |
Learning Outcomes
The students who have succeeded in this course;
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lesson Plan
| Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
| 1) | Aesthetics and quality areas | |
| 2) | Aesthetic theories | |
| 3) | Subjectivist and objectivist approaches in aesthetic phenomenon | |
| 4) | Aesthetic subject analysis | |
| 5) | Aesthetic object analysis | |
| 6) | Aesthetic object analysis | |
| 7) | Aesthetic value analysis / Aesthetic experience | |
| 8) | Midterm | |
| 9) | Ethical aesthetic relationship | |
| 10) | Artistic creation conditions | |
| 11) | Design culture | |
| 12) | Architecture aesthetics relationship | |
| 13) | Transition from formal aesthetics to symbolic aesthetics | |
| 14) | Validity of aesthetic judgment |
Sources
| Course Notes / Textbooks: | Tunalı, İ. Remzi Kitabevi; Tunalı İ. Tasarım Felsefesine Giriş, Yem Yayınları; Tumuçin A. Estetik (Felsefe Dizisi) Bulut Yayınları; Aydınlı S., Mimarlıkta Estetik Değerler İTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Yayınları |
| References: | Tunalı, İ. Remzi Kitabevi; Tunalı İ. Tasarım Felsefesine Giriş, Yem Yayınları; Tumuçin A. Estetik (Felsefe Dizisi) Bulut Yayınları; Aydınlı S., Mimarlıkta Estetik Değerler İTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Yayınları |
Course-Program Learning Outcome Relationship
| Learning Outcomes | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Outcomes | |||||||||
| 1) - Gaining discursive, theoretical and factual information from various environments, in local, national and global context for related field, architectural design/ planning/ design activities and researches, she has required ability and comprehension to reflect the information on academic environment. | |||||||||
| 2) - Has intellectual, discursive, scientific, technologic, esthetic, artistic, historic and cultural information and comprehension about related field. | |||||||||
| 3) - Has knowledge and understanding on human and community oriented and sensitive to environment (natural and built) architectural design/ planning/ design/ research methods on the related field. | |||||||||
| 4) - Has multidimensional knowledge and understanding on economics, topics related to disasters and environmental and societal sustainability principles and standards. | |||||||||
| 5) - They have knowledge about the principles, laws, regulations and standards related to their field. | |||||||||
| 6) - Has knowledge and understanding about institutional and ethical values related to the concerned field. | |||||||||
| 7) - Has knowledge and understanding about the place / importance of the related field in its historical, geographical, social and cultural context. | |||||||||
| 8) - Has ability to develop concepts in architectural design/ planning/ design fields. | |||||||||
| 9) - Has ability to provide integrity between discourse, theory and practise for architectural design / planning / design activities and researches. | |||||||||
| 10) - Has ability to identify facts, potential, problems and required researches for these in architectural design/ planning/ design issues. | |||||||||
Course - Learning Outcome Relationship
| No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
| Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
| 1) | - Gaining discursive, theoretical and factual information from various environments, in local, national and global context for related field, architectural design/ planning/ design activities and researches, she has required ability and comprehension to reflect the information on academic environment. | 4 |
| 2) | - Has intellectual, discursive, scientific, technologic, esthetic, artistic, historic and cultural information and comprehension about related field. | 5 |
| 3) | - Has knowledge and understanding on human and community oriented and sensitive to environment (natural and built) architectural design/ planning/ design/ research methods on the related field. | 4 |
| 4) | - Has multidimensional knowledge and understanding on economics, topics related to disasters and environmental and societal sustainability principles and standards. | 5 |
| 5) | - They have knowledge about the principles, laws, regulations and standards related to their field. | 3 |
| 6) | - Has knowledge and understanding about institutional and ethical values related to the concerned field. | 3 |
| 7) | - Has knowledge and understanding about the place / importance of the related field in its historical, geographical, social and cultural context. | 5 |
| 8) | - Has ability to develop concepts in architectural design/ planning/ design fields. | |
| 9) | - Has ability to provide integrity between discourse, theory and practise for architectural design / planning / design activities and researches. | 5 |
| 10) | - Has ability to identify facts, potential, problems and required researches for these in architectural design/ planning/ design issues. |
Learning Activity and Teaching Methods
| Expression | |
| Brainstorming/ Six tihnking hats | |
| Lesson | |
| Reading |
Assessment & Grading Methods and Criteria
| Written Exam (Open-ended questions, multiple choice, true-false, matching, fill in the blanks, sequencing) | |
| Homework | |
| Observation |
Assessment & Grading
| Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
| Quizzes | 1 | % 30 |
| Presentation | 1 | % 25 |
| Final | 1 | % 45 |
| total | % 100 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 55 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 45 | |
| total | % 100 | |
Workload and ECTS Credit Grading
| Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
| Course Hours | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Midterms | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Jury | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Total Workload | 60 | ||