ISTANBUL OKAN UNIVERSITY INFORMATION PACKAGE / COURSE CATALOGUE
| Architecture (English) | |||||
| Bachelor | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF-LLL: Level 6 | ||
General course introduction information
| Course Code: | ARCDE502 | ||||||||
| Course Name: | Productıon, Consumptıon And The Role Of Archıtect | ||||||||
| Course Semester: | Fall | ||||||||
| Course Credits: |
|
||||||||
| Language of instruction: | TR-EN | ||||||||
| Course Requisites: | |||||||||
| Does the Course Require Work Experience?: | No | ||||||||
| Type of course: | Department Elective | ||||||||
| Course Level: |
|
||||||||
| Mode of Delivery: | Face to face | ||||||||
| Course Coordinator : | Öğr.Gör. B.Öğretim Elemanı | ||||||||
| Course Lecturer(s): | |||||||||
| Course Assistants: |
Course Objective and Content
| Course Objectives: | To run discussions on multidimensional aspects of space production and to embrace the role of the architect as a subject, producing in these aspects; to develop a critical understanding through architecture/architect that will be traced through both alternative and mainstream modes of architecture composes the content of the course. |
| Course Content: | Discussions will be held on the multi-dimensional content of space production. |
Learning Outcomes
The students who have succeeded in this course;
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lesson Plan
| Week | Subject | Related Preparation |
| 1) | Introduction | |
| 2) | Architecture as a Profession | |
| 3) | Architecture as a Profession | |
| 4) | Architecture as a Profession | |
| 5) | Breaking Points: Changes on Ways of Production | |
| 6) | Breaking Points: Changes on Ways of Production | |
| 7) | Breaking Points: Changes on Ways of Production | |
| 8) | Mid-Term Exam / Presentations | |
| 9) | The Changing Role of the Architects as an Actor | |
| 10) | The Changing Role of the Architects as an Actor | |
| 11) | The Changing Role of the Architects as an Actor | |
| 12) | Architectural Production: Discourses and Practices | |
| 13) | Architectural Production: Discourses and Practices | |
| 14) | Architectural Production: Discourses and Practices |
Sources
| Course Notes / Textbooks: | Spector, T. (2001). The Ethical Architect: The Dilemma of Contemporary Practice. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. Spencer, D. (2018). Neoliberalizmin Mimarlığı: Çağdaş Mimarlığın Denetim ve İtaat Aracına Dönüşme Süreci. İletişim Yayınları: İstanbul Hubbard, P. (2011). Key Thinkers on Space and Place. Los Angeles: Sage. Rauterberg, H., Aston, P., & Holtz, C. (2012). Talking Architecture: Interviews with architects. Munich: Prestel. Tanyeli, U. (2017). Yıkarak Yapmak. Metis Yayınları, İstanbul. Tanyeli U. (2007). Mimarlığın Aktörleri: Türkiye 1900-2000. İstanbul: Garanti Galeri. A.Krista Sykes(ed.) (2017). "Yeni Bir Gündem İnşa Etmek: Mimarlık Kuramı 1993-2009", Küre Yay: Istanbul Featherstone, M. (2013). Postmodernizm ve Tüketim Kültürü. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yay. Rand, A. (2008). Hayatın Kaynağı. (Dişbudak Belkıs, Çev.). İstanbul: Plato Film Yayınları. Urry, J., & Öğdül Rahmi G. (1999). Mekânları Tüketmek. İstanbul: Ayrıntı. |
| References: | Spector, T. (2001). The Ethical Architect: The Dilemma of Contemporary Practice. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. Spencer, D. (2018). Neoliberalizmin Mimarlığı: Çağdaş Mimarlığın Denetim ve İtaat Aracına Dönüşme Süreci. İletişim Yayınları: İstanbul Hubbard, P. (2011). Key Thinkers on Space and Place. Los Angeles: Sage. Rauterberg, H., Aston, P., & Holtz, C. (2012). Talking Architecture: Interviews with architects. Munich: Prestel. Tanyeli, U. (2017). Yıkarak Yapmak. Metis Yayınları, İstanbul. Tanyeli U. (2007). Mimarlığın Aktörleri: Türkiye 1900-2000. İstanbul: Garanti Galeri. A.Krista Sykes(ed.) (2017). "Yeni Bir Gündem İnşa Etmek: Mimarlık Kuramı 1993-2009", Küre Yay: Istanbul Featherstone, M. (2013). Postmodernizm ve Tüketim Kültürü. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yay. Rand, A. (2008). Hayatın Kaynağı. (Dişbudak Belkıs, Çev.). İstanbul: Plato Film Yayınları. Urry, J., & Öğdül Rahmi G. (1999). Mekânları Tüketmek. İstanbul: Ayrıntı. |
Course-Program Learning Outcome Relationship
| Learning Outcomes | 1 |
2 |
3 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Outcomes | |||||||||
| 1) - Gaining discursive, theoretical and factual information from various environments, in local, national and global context for related field, architectural design/ planning/ design activities and researches, she has required ability and comprehension to reflect the information on academic environment. | |||||||||
| 2) - Has intellectual, discursive, scientific, technologic, esthetic, artistic, historic and cultural information and comprehension about related field. | |||||||||
| 3) - Has knowledge and understanding on human and community oriented and sensitive to environment (natural and built) architectural design/ planning/ design/ research methods on the related field. | |||||||||
| 4) - Has multidimensional knowledge and understanding on economics, topics related to disasters and environmental and societal sustainability principles and standards. | |||||||||
| 5) - They have knowledge about the principles, laws, regulations and standards related to their field. | |||||||||
| 6) - Has knowledge and understanding about institutional and ethical values related to the concerned field. | |||||||||
| 7) - Has knowledge and understanding about the place / importance of the related field in its historical, geographical, social and cultural context. | |||||||||
| 8) - Has ability to develop concepts in architectural design/ planning/ design fields. | |||||||||
| 9) - Has ability to provide integrity between discourse, theory and practise for architectural design / planning / design activities and researches. | |||||||||
| 10) - Has ability to identify facts, potential, problems and required researches for these in architectural design/ planning/ design issues. | |||||||||
Course - Learning Outcome Relationship
| No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
| Program Outcomes | Level of Contribution | |
| 1) | - Gaining discursive, theoretical and factual information from various environments, in local, national and global context for related field, architectural design/ planning/ design activities and researches, she has required ability and comprehension to reflect the information on academic environment. | |
| 2) | - Has intellectual, discursive, scientific, technologic, esthetic, artistic, historic and cultural information and comprehension about related field. | |
| 3) | - Has knowledge and understanding on human and community oriented and sensitive to environment (natural and built) architectural design/ planning/ design/ research methods on the related field. | |
| 4) | - Has multidimensional knowledge and understanding on economics, topics related to disasters and environmental and societal sustainability principles and standards. | |
| 5) | - They have knowledge about the principles, laws, regulations and standards related to their field. | |
| 6) | - Has knowledge and understanding about institutional and ethical values related to the concerned field. | |
| 7) | - Has knowledge and understanding about the place / importance of the related field in its historical, geographical, social and cultural context. | |
| 8) | - Has ability to develop concepts in architectural design/ planning/ design fields. | |
| 9) | - Has ability to provide integrity between discourse, theory and practise for architectural design / planning / design activities and researches. | |
| 10) | - Has ability to identify facts, potential, problems and required researches for these in architectural design/ planning/ design issues. |
Learning Activity and Teaching Methods
| Expression | |
| Lesson | |
| Group study and homework | |
| Reading | |
| Project preparation |
Assessment & Grading Methods and Criteria
| Written Exam (Open-ended questions, multiple choice, true-false, matching, fill in the blanks, sequencing) | |
| Homework | |
| Group project |
Assessment & Grading
| Semester Requirements | Number of Activities | Level of Contribution |
| Attendance | 14 | % 15 |
| Quizzes | 1 | % 10 |
| Presentation | 1 | % 15 |
| Jury | 1 | % 30 |
| Final | 1 | % 30 |
| total | % 100 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 70 | |
| PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 30 | |
| total | % 100 | |
Workload and ECTS Credit Grading
| Activities | Number of Activities | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
| Course Hours | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 1 | 14 |
| Homework Assignments | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Midterms | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Final | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Total Workload | 48 | ||